It’s hard to select and implement a community platform.
You need to know the different platforms, their pricing tiers, comparable features, and know if others liked the platform.
Then you need to see demos of each and negotiate with each. It’s an exhaustive, risky, process.
We’ve spent 5 months pulling together our experiences (and data) into a simple tool that can do this for you. Today, we’re happy to launch our online community platform tool which lets you compare, filter, and read the reviews of the top platforms.
If you want to know what these platforms cost, what features they offer, what community professionals think of each of them, and get quotes, click here.
The tool is entirely free to use – we only ask you to help us out by submitting a review of platforms you’ve used in the past.
Don’t do big development projects without testing the idea manually first.
Want to build a quest/badging system with unique journeys for different members? Do it manually first (yes, reach out to each member with an email when they reach each stage).
You want all the information before you begin development.
Don’t launch a huge ambassador program, try to find some way of recognizing one person for their expertise and seeing how it works.
Don’t build an automation series without manually testing different ideas first.
Don’t revamp your homepage without testing the unique elements for popularity first.
Making changes post-development is expensive, time-intensive, and costs you a lot of internal capital. You need to test every major development before you do it. These insights will inform and drive what you do.
There aren’t many ideas you can’t test manually first.
Aside, 50% of the time you’ll learn that the big development project has no real impact and you can skip it. You’re welcome!
Fake news isn’t a behavior problem, it’s a taxonomy problem.
The Onion has been serving up fake news for two decades without (much) complaint.
The problem is when fake news that pretends to be real news.
You can’t build relationships with a proven army of fact-checkers to distinguish what isn’t true. But that’s not the problem for you. Your problem isn’t disproving the negative, but highlighting the positive.
Build a set of categories that help members find the best stuff. Have 5 to 10 respected community members help. Build a set of categories. Begin simply with the following:
- [NEW] – for genuinely new ideas in the community.
- [UNPROVEN] – when there isn’t much evidence it succeeds yet.
- [TESTED] – for when the idea has been tested by members and generally accepted.
Now members can quickly find the latest cutting edge ideas, see what’s tested and has worked, and what’s not proven yet – but might work. You can use more than one tag at a time.
Looking for the good is far more fun and useful than trying to remove the bad.
Most communities have far too many pages.
This is bad for the user experience (and bad for SEO).
Take a few minutes during lunch to pick a random page and analyze who is using it and why.
You can do this through your own metrics and augment that data with a survey (either as a pop-up request) or a simple link.
In your data look at:
- Where did people arrive from?
- Where did people go next?
- How long did they spend on the page?
- Where do they click on the page?
- What is the value of the page?
In your survey ask what people want on the page and how it can be improved.
You will often discover:
1) You have a niche group of people who want something specific. This might be a unique group of people you can target through unique content, SEO, events, expert webinars etc…
2) You can either improve this page or deliver the information in a better format. Once you know exactly what people want, you can improve the page. It might work better as information in the onboarding of members, as a specific downloadable resource, or simply to prioritize the information better on the page itself.
3) You can close the page down. Often the page might not deliver enough value and you can remove it entirely.
Try this for one obscure page and test your results. The information might create unique opportunities.
StackOverflow introduces one of the most impressive new community ideas in a while; technical resumés.
Members can now create a story based upon their score and contributions to the community. This lets the top members stand out and gives employers more information.
Not everyone will use it. Most people don’t have a good enough reputation. I suspect though as employers see it more and more often they might start requesting it.
This is such an incredibly useful (and transferable) idea.
The genius is using a reputation score as an asset which offers members something of even greater value (which is the way reputation is supposed to work). Good scores (and extra participation/helping people) can lead to better career prospects.
Perhaps having an entire developer story is beyond your site’s coding ability, but having a single grading, rating, or score that can be easily linked to for employers is definitely an idea that can be used elsewhere.
Hiring an employee is usually a $50k+ decision. If you have two equal candidates but one has solved 134 questions, is a top-10 rated member, and has a solid track record over several years, it’s not really a close contest.
For most of us, this is going to mean figuring out how to include two simple questions.
How many problems have members solved and how difficult were those problems? How can you let members show this off?
What do you think the BestBuy community wants you to do?
They want you to search for an answer.
What is the primary thing you want most visitors (or members) to do when they visit your community?
- Search for an answer?
- Ask a question?
- Share a tip?
- Share what they are working on?
- Connect with people like them?
- Message someone new?
- Share a problem?
- Submit a column?
Put this call to action at the very top of your page.
Communication (between members) is the most important part of a community, but it’s not the only part. Don’t stop at a simple forum. Push your technology further.
There are many directions you can go in.
1) Add a blog or main news page. Write about what members are doing. Feature contributions from members. Do roundups of the sector. Highlight what’s going on. This is your local newspaper.
2) Reviews and ratings. Add ratings and reviews of the top product vendors. Let members add their reviews. Host awards for the highest rated.
3) Document / wiki. Document the collective wisdom of the group. Create the definitive database for the sector. Have guides for newcomers, experts, and people tackling the most common problems. This works really well if the community is based around a product.
4) Organize events. Online or offline. Create your own events. Host interviews with experts. Better, let members organize their own events. Let them host their own interviews too.
5) Ratings. Create a reputation system. Make it easier for the top members to stand out.
6) Add courses. Develop learning or training modules people can progress through. This raises the quality of discussion.
Most community platforms enable you to do all of the above. If you are on an open source platform, you can add features when you need them at little cost.
Two common mistakes here. The first is stopping once the forum is going. This leaves a pile of potential on the table. The second is trying to implement all of the above at once (especially from the beginning). You need a lively hub of activity before you can add the above.
Once the forum is going, start pushing your technology a little further.