Running A Simple ‘Helpful Content’ Analysis

October 8, 2020 ,,Comments Off on Running A Simple ‘Helpful Content’ Analysis

This abstract reminded me of a recent project.

Over the summer, we worked with a community team that spent just over 40% of their time creating content for members.

They were creating videos, webinars, playbooks, announcements, writing personal blog posts, etc…

But they hadn’t ever checked which content was most helpful to members. They simply kept pumping out more of it.

We suspected this was overkill but needed the data to prove it.

So we ran three simple analyses.

The first was a simple regression analysis. We clustered the content into groups by the medium (videos, webinars etc..) and looked to see which type of content received the most helpful votes.

Next, we did the same analysis but clustered the content by topic.

Finally, we interviewed a handful of community members and asked them to recall which content they had found most useful within the past few years.

The first analysis showed playbooks were by far the most popular type of content. Announcements scored dead-last (despite the team having to spend the most amount of time jumping through numerous internal hurdles to post these).

The second showed newcomer level content received slightly more helpful votes than any other type.

The interviews, however, yielded the most fascinating insight; community members couldn’t keep up. They would bookmark material which seemed really useful but never get around to reading it. This made them feel bad.

In short, the effort the community team was putting into creating lots of fresh content was making members feel bad.

We ran a follow-up analysis and discovered the number of helpful votes had declined in recent years in an almost inverse proportion to the quantity of content created.

We then used this data to drastically cut down on the quantity of content created, stop publishing announcements, and double-down on the playbooks and newcomer-level material.

This kind of analysis isn’t especially difficult to do and can help you save time while giving members a better experience.

Comments Off
©2023 FeverBee Limited, Apartment 2410, 251 Southwark Bridge Road, London SE1 6FN England FEVERBEE

We’d like you to join us.

We’re a group of community professionals who push each other to the cutting edge of our work. Every day we share our experiences, highlight new expertise, and push one another to become the best community builders we can be.

The day you join, you’ll get access to 1000+ practical tips, dozens of resources, and unlimited access to the top experts in our space. You’ll also get to see how we go about building a community amongst our own audience.

It takes just 30 seconds and doesn’t cost a thing.


Level Price  
ALL COURSES $750.00 per Month.
Community Development Program $1,100.00 per Month.
Director of Community $8,770.00 per Month.
Free Trial - Accelerator Program Free.
Community Accelerator (founding members) [annually] $250.00 per Year.
Community Accelerator and FeverBee Intelligence [monthly] $45.00 per Month.
Community Accelerator and FeverBee Intelligence [annually] $450.00 per Year.
Full Community Upgrade (Large Enterprise Only) [monthly] $750.00 per Month.
Full Community Upgrade (Large Enterprise Only) [annually] $7,600.00 per Year.