Last week’s post generated considerable feedback. Here is some clarity:
| Following | Community |
| Short-term | Long-term |
| Quick growth | Slow growth |
| Focus on growth | Focus on engagement |
| Unlimited # members | Limited # members |
| Limited interaction between members | High interactions between members |
| Fixed strategy | Emergent strategy |
| Easy | Hard |
| Coca-Cola | Innocent Drinks |
| Develop audiences for products | Develops products for the audience |
| Homebase | Wiggly Wigglers |
| Content about topic | Content about community |
| Centralized control | Share power with top members |
| Reactive to questions | Stimulating discussions |
| Any products | Sociable products |
| Audience wants info about products | Audience wants info about each other |
| Build relationships with group as a single entity | Build strong relationships with top members |



Richard... I am not sure I agree this is that cut and dry.
Yes, there are some things that are either left of right side (E.g., Build relationships with group as a single entity vs Build strong relationships with top members, but I can easily say that a following can be strategic, long-term, about it's audience, not products, is not easy to do, etc. All the things you say community are.
For example, I follow @jeffhurt on twitter. His approach is strategic, long-term, about people and relationships. He is stimulating and creates discussions with his community of followers.
I like the comparison approach, but I don't think anything is ever absolute.
Now, your last post is excellent and dead on!!!! --- Nice!
http://www.feverbee.com/2010/04/deciding-what-you-really-want.html
Posted by: Christopher Uschan | Wednesday, 05 May 2010 at 16:06