An audience responds and interacts with you - not each other.
A community builds relationships around a strong common interest.
Most media platforms have an audience, not a community.
There are some great exceptions. HuffingtonPost, The Guardian, many blogs, and even radio shows have a intelligent (and less intelligent) debates.
Classic magazines like Amiga Power spent as much time writing about games as they did about self-indulgent community material - but it worked. My former employers, PCGamer, did the same. It built a community. It encouraged interaction between readers.
It's readers felt they were part of something. They frequently referred to readers, by name, in articles. That's powerful.
If you're trying to build a community around a media/content entity, you need to change the entity to faciliate a community. That means turning some pages to member columns, hosting live events/activites (online or offline). Featuring members in different ways. Summarizing the best member contributions. Setting goals/actions for the audience to undertake and reporrting on the progress.
For simplicity, focus on three things:
1) Featuring members. Interviews, mentions in articles, reviews/reports on member milestones, member contributions/comments.
2) Creating opportunities for members to interact with each other. Live events and activities. Ongoing debates. Letters to each other (not just the magazine) etc...
3) Establish common goals/purpose and culture. Have a personality. Have inside jokes that only some members get. Set common activities/challenges/goals for the audience.



Great posting (as always), thanks for the info.
I wonder if 10K Twitter followers is big enough as an audience? I guess it all depends on the interactions.
From reading your blog I learned that without strong common interest there's no community feeling building up. But I struggle to find the strong common interest among my followers.
I guess Jokes and Funny Sayings is not special enough to build up a community.
Could you post more about identifying the strong common interest? Please? Thank you!
Posted by: Ulrich | Friday, 10 August 2012 at 09:57
More important is that Durant is not only offensive sharp, he can always stand out at the crucial moment to lead the team. In the final few games, Durant has several short-term sudden score outbreak to help the team pulled away in one fell swoop a lead.
This final is the same, http://www.jordanretro4firered2012.com/ hard to distinguish the first three quarters of Spain and the U.S. team, the fourth quarter, they still bite the score on the U.S. team was chasing the pointer with 6 minutes 50 seconds 86-90. At this point, Durant stood out with a pointers in mind to suppress the Spanish team's comeback momentum, while for the U.S. team to stabilize the situation.
Posted by: jordan 4 fire red 2012 | Wednesday, 15 August 2012 at 09:07
Everyone loves it whenever people come together and share ideas.
Great website, keep it up!
Posted by: seo articles | Sunday, 19 August 2012 at 11:46