Businesses are struggling to create thriving online communities.
Sainsbury’s online community is very quiet, as is Sexperience (Channel 4), Wesabe, AirFrance’s Bluenity and ElevenMoms (WalMart). MiniUSA was crippled by design for a community in the first place.
Telstra has a mediocre level of activity, as does T-Mobile’s Sidekick and BA’s MetroTwin.
I think these communities have failed for two major reasons
1. Not enough hustle. There is no visible community manager rallying members to participate. There is nobody hustling members to be involved and initiating fun things to do. Theses businesses are simply too passive/reactive to have an online community.
2. Bad design. Nearly every business opts for a beautiful website over simple tools that work. Bad move. Focus on the function. Forums, mailing groups and Facebook work fine. In many of these communities it's difficult to see the latest activity, impossible to talk to members and hard to even contribute without clicking several times.
3. No community content. There is too great a focus on the subject matter and not enough on the community members. Your community wants to know more about each other.
Simplify your design and hustle like crazy and create content about your community.



You are so right about needing a strong community leader/director helping and nurturing a community to have better engagement. In our industry, the really successful forums & community site always have one main bandleader and a series of trusted sidekicks that keep things moving.
Posted by: Anne-Marie Faiola | Monday, 07 December 2009 at 17:38
I think there's a 4th thing too. Those with an online community often forget that they are just one port of call for hassled, time-poor people.
The up-front question that should be asked is: Are we trying to serve a need that is already being served elsewhere?
And if the answer to that question is "yes" then don't even start. Go where the action is instead.
Unfortunately this requires a level of humility that most organisations do not possess.
Posted by: Matt Moore | Monday, 07 December 2009 at 21:10
I just wonder how much people really want to participate in 'brand' based communities versus issue based ones. Facebook works because it is generic enough to be what you want it to be as a user. With a brand based community there is always the idea that the brand sits in the background someplace - lurking.
Also, while I agree with what you've said above, for most brands you have marketing managers commissioning these projects who have no idea what it takes to build and run a community and who therefore build no ongoing sustainability into the project - they run a community as if it is a campaign with a shelf life, whereas communities are meant to be ongoing and require ongoing commitment.
Posted by: Brianhoadley | Tuesday, 08 December 2009 at 11:42
Some really solid points here Richard on buidling / managing community - plus there has *got* to be some value add. Without that, you can build it, like Mr Costner in The Field of Dreams, but they won't come..
Posted by: CarveConsulting | Tuesday, 08 December 2009 at 17:16
Brian - I think we have a slogan "A community is not a campaign!"
Posted by: Matt Moore | Tuesday, 08 December 2009 at 22:26
Great post.
Oh and:
"I think these communities have failed for two major reasons"
You name three major reasons.
Posted by: Brian | Wednesday, 27 January 2010 at 12:48